Exploring Cultures: Homesteads and Huts of Various Kenyan Ethnic Groups

A further look into the theme of built vernacular heritage (#builtheritage) exploring the topic in more in-depth detail from the perspective of a different country, Kenya in eastern Africa.

Variations in homesteads/huts by different ethnic groups

The wide mixture of ethnic groups in sub-Saharan, central and eastern Africa, makes it one of the most diverse regions in the world, and Kenya is ranked 8th highest culturally heterogeneous country (worldatlas.com, 2016).

The main three ethnic groups in Kenya (Bantus, Cushites and Nilotes) contain a further 42 sub-groups, each of which has its own diverse traditions, customs, and practices.

The method by which each ethnic group constructs their homesteads/huts varies a great deal from region to region and is heavily influenced by the characteristics of the different local settings. These include climatic, geographical and topographical differences as well as economic dependencies, living arrangements and livelihoods (amongst many other factors).

Photo Credit: Kikuyu hut of the 3rd wife in Kikuyu village at Bomas of Kenya, Leisser, A (2006) [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kikuyu_village_01.jpg]
Photo Credit: Kikuyu hut of the 3rd wife in Kikuyu village at Bomas of Kenya, Leisser, A (2006) [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kikuyu_village_01.jpg]
The Bantus group is the largest community and contains subgroups such as Kikuyu, Kisii, Embu, etc. They live not only in the western, eastern and central regions of Kenya but also in coastal areas where the climate is cooler and there is arid to semi-arid fertile land. They are usually agrarian subsistence farmers who grow and produce cash crops such as tea, coffee, and other grain crops.

The houses of the Kikuyu group are constructed with poles and lattices made from saplings and filled with mud, brushwood walls or planked with hewn depending on the hut. The Roofs are thatched with grass. A layer of grass is added before the beginning of each rainy season and the number of grass layers indicates how old the house is (Agikuyu, 2014, Advameg Inc, 2016a; Kamenji, 2013). The Kisii group construct a roundhouse without any windows, made from a frame of thin branches, mud walls and a conically-shaped thatched roof. (Advameg Inc, 2016b; Hakansson, 1996).

Photo Credit: The Rendille homesteads/huts, African Latitude [http://www.africanlatitude.com/en/info/the-ancestral-peoples/the-rendille.html]
Photo Credit: The Rendille homesteads/huts, African Latitude [http://www.africanlatitude.com/en/info/the-ancestral-peoples/the-rendille.html]
The Cushites group, sub-groups of which include Oroma (or Orma), Borana and Rendille, inhabit the north and northeast of Kenya through to the Indian Ocean, where the climate is dry and the land is either harsh desert or arid/semi-arid. They live a (semi-) nomadic life as pastoralists and herdsmen.

The homesteads/huts of these groups are mostly portable huts constructed from tree saplings framed with woven mats and grass. Depending on the group, each village consists of five to ten or ten to thirty family huts arranged huts in a circle or semi-circle shape (Jenkins, 2008; 2015a; b).

The Oroma (Orma) live in round huts comprised of a wooden frame covered with woven mats and grass. Some groups live in temporary settlements and others live in permanent villages (Jenkins, 2008). Most of their huts / houses are made from the pliable saplings of Danisa trees, doum palm leaf fibres and grass mats. There are two types of Oroma houses � a hemispherical house about two meters high, and a beehive-shaped house about six meters in height � and these are grouped into circular manyattas (villages). These manyattas can either be sedentary or temporary to suit their nomadic lifestyle; the former are located in towns and the latter in the bush (Irungu, 2000). The Borana group constructs modular, sturdy houses or huts made up of interwoven branches and thatched grass all the way to the ground. These huts are made to be transportable on the back of a camel so that they can literally �move house� when they go to live in a new location. Their temporary settlements are generally made up of between ten and thirty huts (Jenkins, 2015a). Unlike other nomadic groups, the Rendille tend to live in established villages based around clans. Their villages consist of up to one hundred huts which are constructed with stick frames with wild sisal mats and built in a circle with thorn enclosures for the livestock inside (Jenkins, 2015b; KenyaInformationGuide.com, 2015a).

Photo Credit: Maasai Manyattas, Webika Ltd., (2016)
Photo Credit: Maasai Manyattas, Webika Ltd., (2016)

The Nilotes group, which includes sub-groups such as the Maasai, Samburu, Luo, Turkana and Kalenjin people, live in the area around the East African Valley and Lake Victoria in western Kenya. They are (semi-) nomadic pastoralists and agrarians who also practice fishing.

The Maasai�s huts are called manyatta (or enkaji, inkajijik) and their huts are designed to last for only a few months � just long enough to suit their traditional nomadic lifestyle. The temporary huts or shelters are loaf-shaped and made from a mixture of mud, sticks, grass, cow dung and urine. The simple framed structure with timber poles is fixed directly into the ground and interwoven with smaller branches and twigs. The roof is covered with layers of dried grass. Circular fences (known as kraals, these are shared by the extended family) are created from the thorns of acacia trees to protect their livestock from lions and other wild animals (KenyaInformationGuide.com, 2015b; Maasai Association, n.d.; STEP, n.d.). The Luo group live in one-room circular huts made from mud and wattle, some of which have thatched roofs, others corrugated metal (Achieng Inc, 2016c). Like other pastoralist groups, the Samburu people build their temporary settlements (manyattas) with portable huts constructed with mud walls and grass-thatched roofs. The group usually have five to ten family huts in a group and surround their settlement with a thorny fence. They stay in one grazing area for around five to six weeks or until there is no longer adequate pasture or water available. Every time they move to a new location, they build new nuts in new manyattas (About.com, 2016; KenyaInformationGuide.com, 2015c).

Photo Credit: Left: A homestead layout of the Luo group, Achieng, 2005: 9; Right: A homestead layout of the Kikuyu group, Kamenju, 2013: 91.
Photo Credit: Left: A homestead layout of the Luo group, Achieng, 2005: 9; Right: A homestead layout of the Kikuyu group, Kamenju, 2013: 91.

The building methods of the various ethnic groups, the structures of the huts and the layouts of the settlements are all influenced by and integrated with the socio-cultural settings, customs, rituals and traditions of each group. Furthermore, the traditionally polygamous* households of some groups means that homesteads are often comprised of more than one hut (house). There may also be additional outdoor structures such as a barn for the animals. The position, orientation and structure of huts within the homesteads differ depending on the group (Lee-Smith, 1990; Kamenju, 2013).

There are many rituals and customary practices involved in the construction of homesteads and huts depending on the group. For example, in the case of the Maasai and Kikuyu groups, it is the women�s responsibility to build their home. From the age of sixteen, Maasai women learn to construct and maintain their kraals (homesteads) from their mothers and grandmothers (Maasai Association, n.d.; STEP, n.d.) and Kikuyu women are responsible for building their own home (woman�s house, Nyumba) once they are married (Lee-Smith, 1990; Kamenju, 2013).

The Modernisation and Conservation of homesteads/huts

Sensitive changes to the traditional construction practices of the #builtheritage homesteads/huts of Kenya may be necessary to ensure that these are ecologically sustainable and able to withstand recurring environmental and climatic changes, as well as to improve safety and sanitary standards. A housing project named �Eco Manyatta� assists the Kenyan Maasai community in their housing arrangements using environmentally friendly and locally available resources (Eco Manyatta Housing Limited, 2015) so that the Maasai people will be able to continue to live in their traditional style. Local organisations are also working alongside Maasai women in order to improve various aspects such as lighting, ventilation and waterproof roofs (STEP, n.d.).

Comparison with the Celtic Britons� Roundhouse (ancestral antecedent of British Isles) (please refer to article written by Ms. Sheila W Ndirangu)

Photo Credit: Left: Roundhouses - Celtic Houses, Cross (2015); Right: Rounded huts, Luo Nyanza, Webika Ltd., (2016)
Photo Credit: Left: Roundhouses – Celtic Houses, Cross (2015); Right: Rounded huts, Luo Nyanza, Webika Ltd., (2016)

The roundhouses of Iron Age Celtic Britons share some similarities and resemblance to the homesteads/huts of their Kenyan counterparts in their structure, materials and construction. The Celtic roundhouses used locally available materials such as wood, grass, wattle and animal daubs in their construction. People lived in closed settlements where they found good water and pasture resources (BBC Wales, 2014; Cross, 2015).

The reconstruction and preservation of such ancient vernacular buildings is perceived to be important for historical, educational and tourism purposes. Examples of Celtic Britons Roundhouses can be seen in one of the National History Museum in Wales and the surrounding national parks, whereas the Bomas of Kenya (a museum) has examples of various ethnic homesteads/huts.

By taking a closer look at each of type of dwelling, it is possible to understand how and why each one is constructed differently in order to meet the needs of the people and how they are integrated into their customs, traditions and daily lives. Having searched and written about the #builtheritage of another country, it also enables us to further appreciate the diversity and uniqueness of the cultures, traditions and settings of different countries.

This is especially true of areas in which many different indigenous ethnic groups live and produce their own individual heritage which is manifested in the socio-cultural, spiritual customs and traditions that play a significant part in their lives (Disko & Tugendhat, 2014; IWGIA, n.d.). It is also important to take a holistic and multidisciplinary approach to preserving different heritage sites. Through working with a collaborative, respectful and rights-based approach, as well as through mutual understanding of different traditions and customary settings, careful consideration can be taken into account of the different aspects of preserving and sustaining both tangible and intangible heritage that will last for many more centuries.



This article was produced as a part of a paired task looking at the built vernacular heritage (#builtheritage) of different countries. With an assigned paired intern, Ms. Sheila W Ndirangu of Kenya, the sub-thematic focus was on the built vernacular heritage of community homesteads / huts / dwellings (of various ethnic, indigenous or ancestral groups) in each country. This article is about the homesteads/huts of the main Kenyan ethnic (indigenous) groups, whereas Ms. Sheila W Ndirangu�s article is about the British ancestral housing of Celtic Britons� Roundhouses.


[*] Under the indigenous customs law, multiple marriages with different wives are allowed and each wife lives in their own hut within the family homestead (Achieng, 2005; Lee-Smith, 1990).


Achieng, A. D. (2005). Cultural aspects of housing: a case of the Luo in Kisumu Town, Kenya. XXXIII IAHS World Congress on Housing 26th to 30th September 2005, Pretoria, South Africa, 1-10.

Agikuyu, M (2014). �Gikuyu Architecture, Thingira � Gikuyu Man�s Abode, Joseph W. Kamenju wa Mwangi – Publisher. [https://mukuyu.wordpress.com/tag/kikuyu-house/]

Advameg, Inc (2016a) Countries and their Cultures, Gikuyu. Accessed 27 Aug 2016 [http://www.everyculture.com/wc/Japan-to-Mali/Gikuyu.html]

ibbids. (2016b). Countries and their Cultures, Gusii. Accessed 27 Aug 2016 [http://www.everyculture.com/wc/Japan-to-Mali/Gusii.html#ixzz4IRxCgaZZ]

ibbids. (2016c) Countries and their Cultures, Luo. Accessed 27 Aug 2016 [http://www.everyculture.com/wc/Japan-to-Mali/Luo.html#ixzz4IRyH7aZ2]

About.com (2016). Tribes of Africa, The Samburu. Accessed 27 Aug 2016 [http://goafrica.about.com/library/bl.samburu.htm]

BBC Wales (2014). Iron Age Celts. Accessed 25 Aug 2016 [http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/celts/factfile/homes.shtml]

Cross, N (2015). Round Houses – Celtic Houses and Homes – The Celts and Romans. Accessed 25 Aug 2016 [http://resourcesforhistory.com/Celtic_round_houses.htm]

Disko, S., and Tugendhat, H. (Eds.). (2014).�World Heritage Sites and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights. IWGIA. [http://www.iwgia.org/iwgia_files_publications_files/0698_List_of_Content_orld_Heritage_Sites_Book__FINAL-eb.pdf]

Disko, S., and Tugendhat, H. (Eds.). (2014).�World Heritage Sites and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights. IWGIA. [http://www.iwgia.org/iwgia_files_publications_files/0698_List_of_Content_orld_Heritage_Sites_Book__FINAL-eb.pdf]

Eco Manyatta Housing Limited (2015). ‘eco manyatta’. Accessed 25 Aug 2016 [http://ecomanyattahousing.com/eco-manyatta.html]

Hakansson, N (1996). Gusii, Encyclopedia of World Cultures, The Gale Group, Inc., Accessed 27 Aug 2016 [http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Gusii.aspx]

Irungu, P. (2000). Cattle keeping practices of the Orma people. Results of a household survey in Tana River District, Kenya. KETRI-ILRI Collaborative Study, KETRI, Muguga. Accessed 27 Aug 2016 [https://sbs.uonbi.ac.ke/patrickirungu/files/irungu1.pdf]

IWGIA: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (n.d.). World Heritage Sites and Indigenous Peoples. Accessed 27 Aug 2016


Jenkins, O. B (2008). People Profile, The Oroma of Kenya. Accessed 27 Aug 2016 [http://strategyleader.org/profiles/orma.html]

ibbids. (2015a). People Profile, The Borana of Ethiopia and Kenya. Accessed 27 Aug 2016 [http://strategyleader.org/profiles/borana.html]

ibbids. (2015b). People Profile, The Rendille of Kenya. Accessed 27 Aug 2016 [http://strategyleader.org/profiles/rendille.html]

Kamenju, J. (2013). Transformation of Kikuyu traditional architecture: case study of homesteads in lower Mukurwe-ini, Nyeri, Kenya. The Oslo School of Architecture and Design.

KenyaInformationGuide.com (2015a). The ethnic tribes of Kenya. Accessed 27 Aug 2016 [http://www.kenya-information-guide.com/kenya-tribes.html]

ibbids. (2015b). Maasai: the authentic people of Kenya � a tourist favourite. Accessed 27 Aug 2016 [http://www.kenya-information-guide.com/maasai-tribe.html

ibbids. (2015c). Samburse – a kin of the Maasais. Accessed 27 Aug 2016 [http://www.kenya-information-guide.com/samburu-tribe.html]

Lee-Smith, D. (1990). Women and Housing in Sub-Saharan Africa. Canadian Woman Studies, 11(2), 68-70.

Maasai Association (n.d.). The Maasai people. Accessed 25 Aug 2016 [http://www.maasai-association.org/maasai.html]

STEP: Sustainable Technology Education Project (n.d.): Self-build housing, maasai. Accessed 25 Aug 2016 [http://stepin.org/casestudyc108.html?id=maasai&page=1]

Webika Ltd. (2016). Traditional and Cultural East and North East African Homes. Accessed 26 Aug 2016 [http://www.bukisa.com/articles/365530_traditional-and- cultural-east- and-north- east-african-homes]

Worldatlas.com (2016). Most Ethnically Diverse Countries in the World. Accessed 25 Aug 2016 [http://www.worldatlas.com/articles/most-ethnically-diverse-countries-in-the-world.html] World Heritage Site

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.